[1]刘红文,王立鹏,唐建平.变速恒频风电机组系统方案比较[J].控制与信息技术,2010,(04):16-18.[doi:10.13889/j.issn.2095-3631.2010.04.003]
点击复制

变速恒频风电机组系统方案比较()
分享到:

《控制与信息技术》[ISSN:2095-3631/CN:43-1486/U]

卷:
期数:
2010年04期
页码:
16-18
栏目:
绿色能源与节能
出版日期:
2010-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of System Concepts for Variable Speed Constant Frequency Wind Turbines
文章编号:
1671-8410(2010)04-0016-03
作者:
刘红文王立鹏唐建平
南车株洲电力机车研究所有限公司
关键词:
变速恒频风电机组双馈风电机组直驱风电机组半直驱风电机组
Keywords:
variable speed constant frequency wind turbine doubly-fed wind turbine direct-drive wind turbine semi-direct-drive wind turbine
分类号:
TM315
DOI:
10.13889/j.issn.2095-3631.2010.04.003
摘要:
首先叙述了变速恒频运行的双馈、直驱和半直驱风电机组的特点,然后根据美国国家可再生能源实验室的报告,以年发电量、运行和维护成本、度电成本(COE)等指标,对1.5 MW不同类型的风电机组进行量化比较。其结果表明:双馈风电机组使用标准组件,重量轻,成本最低,年发电量较低;直驱式风电机组成本最高,但维护成本低;半直驱风电机组价格不是很高,维护成本和COE 低,年发电量高,是一种很有竞争力的机型,应用前景广泛。
Abstract:
The characteristics of variable speed constant frequency doubly-fed wind turbine, direct-drive wind turbine and semi-directdrive wind turbine are described. According to the data of U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s report, the quantitative comparisons of different types of 1.5MW wind turbines are carried out based on some indicators such as annual power output, operation maintenance costs and cost of energy (COE) .The results show that DFIG is light, low cost and low annual power output with standard components. The cost of direct-drive wind turbine is highest, but the maintenance cost is low. Semi-direct-drive wind turbine is a very competitive model with low COE, high annual power output, but not very high maintenance cost, which will be applied more widely.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐凤星,佘 岳,盛建科,等.一种基于虚拟同步控制的并网双馈风电机组孤岛穿越技术[J].控制与信息技术,2018,(02):29.[doi:10.13889/j.issn.2096-5427.2018.02.007]
 XU Fengxing,SHE Yue,SHENG Jianke,et al.An Island-through Technology for Grid-connected Doubly-fed Wind Turbine Based on Virtual Synchronization Control[J].High Power Converter Technology,2018,(04):29.[doi:10.13889/j.issn.2096-5427.2018.02.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-26